Applied professional course

GIS Suitability Modelling and Map Quality Assurance

Build a weighted suitability model that can be defended, and put a quality-assurance process around every map you publish.

Catalogue status: PlannedProfessional review: Not yet reviewed

Written teaching content: available for review

Video lessons have not yet been recorded. Written teaching content may be available for review below.

Written teaching content only. This course is not yet available: it has not been professionally reviewed, no lesson is recorded, and enrolment, payment, certificates, downloads and protected access are all disabled.

Review Written Course Content

Reading only. This is not enrolment, booking, purchase, account access, a download or protected learning access.

Written content: Available for review
Video lessons: Not recorded
Professional review: Not yet completed
Enrolment: Not available
Payment: Disabled
Certificates: Disabled
Downloads: Disabled
Protected access: Disabled

Written course content

Return to course overview Return to planned curriculum

Client-style brief

An agency must identify suitable land for a new facility programme across a district and expects the method to be scrutinised in public. The brief is a transparent, weighted suitability model with a documented method, a sensitivity test and a map series that will survive technical challenge.

Professional scenario

Synthetic district pack: terrain, transport, land-cover, utility, designation and settlement layers, plus a stated set of siting requirements and exclusion rules from a synthetic agency brief.

Planning problem

Suitability models are easy to build and hard to defend. Arbitrary weights, hidden reclassifications and unchecked outputs produce maps that look authoritative and cannot be explained. The professional problem is transparency and verifiability, not modelling sophistication.

Learning objectives

Translate a siting brief into explicit criteria, exclusions and measurable indicators.
Build reclassified criterion layers with documented thresholds.
Apply and justify a weighting method and combine layers transparently.
Run sensitivity analysis and validate the model against known reference sites.
Quality-assure the outputs and publish a fully documented method statement.

Modules and lessons

0 of 9 lessons open

Module 1
Module 1 — From brief to criteria
Convert a written siting requirement into a defensible, measurable criteria framework.
Example data: Synthetic agency siting brief, teaching designation and constraint layers, and an Ideeplan-owned criteria specification template.
Module output: Criteria specification with exclusions, indicators, thresholds and sources.
Module 2
Module 2 — Building, weighting and testing the model
Produce the suitability surface and prove it is not an accident of the weights.
Example data: Reclassified criterion layers from Module 1, an Ideeplan-owned weighting worksheet and a set of synthetic reference sites with known outcomes.
Module output: Weighted suitability surface, sensitivity results and a validation table.
Module 3
Module 3 — Quality assurance and defensible publication
Check the model like an auditor would, then publish so the method can be repeated.
Example data: Ideeplan-owned map QA checklist, method-statement template and a teaching set of deliberately flawed output maps.
Module output: Quality-assured suitability map series with a full method statement.

Project brief

A synthetic district with a written agency siting brief, full constraint and context data, and reference sites for validation.

Your role: Spatial analyst producing a publicly scrutinised suitability model.

Information available

Synthetic agency siting brief with requirements and exclusions.
Terrain, transport, land-cover, utility, designation and settlement layers.
Reference sites with known suitability outcomes.
Ideeplan-owned criteria, weighting and QA templates.

Required analysis

Criteria and exclusion specification with sourced thresholds.
Standardisation and no-data treatment of all criterion layers.
Weighted combination under at least two weighting approaches.
Sensitivity analysis across three scenarios.
Validation against reference sites.

Required outputs

Criteria specification document.
Suitability surface and robust-area map.
Sensitivity and validation tables.
Quality-assured numbered map series.
Reproducible method statement with caveats.

Presentation standard: Every parameter documented, no-data shown explicitly, class breaks justified, and outputs described as relative screening rather than decisions.

Marking criteria

Criteria discipline: Exclusions and scored criteria are separated and each threshold cites a source.
Transparency: Weights, tools and parameters are recorded well enough to rebuild the model.
Robustness testing: Sensitivity analysis is run and unstable areas are identified.
Map quality: All planted QA faults are detected and the final series is defect free.
Appropriate claims: Outputs are presented as a screening filter with stated uncertainty.

Quality-assurance checklist

Exclusions and scored criteria are held in separate layers.
No-data cells are never scored as suitable.
Every weight has a recorded source and rationale.
Sensitivity results accompany every published suitability map.
Local siting standards, designation rules, data licences and technical requirements are confirmed with the relevant authority before the model informs any decision.

Common mistakes and correction tasks

Applying equal weights and describing the model as objective. Correction: Record equal weighting as a deliberate choice, state its effect and run a sensitivity comparison.
Letting no-data areas appear as moderately suitable. Correction: Mask no-data explicitly, show it in the legend and recompute the suitable-area statistics.
Modelling at a resolution finer than the coarsest input supports. Correction: Resample the analysis grid to a defensible resolution and rerun the model.
Publishing a single surface with no method statement. Correction: Document every parameter and reissue the package with the method statement attached.

Final deliverable

Site-suitability model package: map series, sensitivity results and reproducible method statement

Audience and role

GIS analysts, spatial planners, infrastructure and site-selection teams, and planning-authority evidence officers.

You act as the spatial analyst building and defending a site-suitability model for an agency.

Prerequisites

Confidence with GIS geoprocessing, raster and vector operations.
Basic understanding of scoring and weighting concepts.

Software access and licensing

Ideeplan Consult provides professional instruction, exercises, synthetic practice data and learning resources. It does not provide, purchase or pay for software licences on behalf of learners.

Required software

QGIS
Suggested version: QGIS 3.x long-term release. Learners or their employers must obtain lawful access.
QGIS project (official website)
Alternative: Browser-based map-reading exercise — Where a learner has no GIS software, selected exercises can be followed as view-only demonstrations. This is not full hands-on GIS training.
Spreadsheet software
Suggested version: Any modern spreadsheet application. Learners or their employers must obtain lawful access.
LibreOffice Calc (official website)
Alternative: Google Sheets — A browser-based alternative suitable for the calculation exercises. It is not identical to desktop spreadsheet software.
Word processor
Suggested version: Any modern word-processing application. Learners or their employers must obtain lawful access.
LibreOffice Writer (official website)

Learners or their employers must obtain lawful access to any required software before starting the practical exercises.
Only official software-provider websites are linked from this site. Ideeplan Consult does not host installers.
No shared accounts, passwords, activation keys or cracked software are provided, and software credentials are never collected or stored.
Ideeplan Consult claims no endorsement, partnership or sponsorship by any software provider.
Software licence costs are not included in any Ideeplan course fee, and no trial, student, educational or free licence is promised to be available.
Where a legitimate alternative is suitable, it is identified separately and is not claimed to be identical to the required software.
If a learner lacks the required software, a view-only demonstration or browser-based exercise may be offered where possible; this is never described as full hands-on software training.

Where to obtain project data

Every exercise in this course uses synthetic or Ideeplan-owned training data. This section explains how to replace that training data with lawful local project data in your own jurisdiction when you apply the method to a real site.

Free access and free reuse are different things. A dataset you can view or download is not automatically a dataset you may republish, adapt or use in a paid commercial deliverable.
Confirm the current licence on the source website before you reuse anything. Terms, prices and availability change without notice.
Ideeplan Consult does not host, redistribute or resell any third-party dataset, and links only to official or openly licensed public sources.
Never use private, confidential, pirated, scraped or otherwise unauthorised data. If a source requires a licence or a fee, obtain it properly or use an alternative.
Record the version, extraction date and coverage of every dataset you use, and cite it in the report and in the map credit block.
Ideeplan training coordinates are supplied on a named local grid (IDP-LOCAL-GRID) in metres. Local synthetic training grid in metres: not georeferenced to the Earth and not suitable for overlaying with real-world basemaps without a separately supplied transformation. Never attach an EPSG code, projection file or real-world CRS to training data that has none.
When you move to a real site, obtain the coordinate reference system from the survey or the mapping agency and record it in the drawing and the report. Do not infer or guess a CRS from the numbers.
If a public source becomes unavailable, changes its terms or starts charging, use the alternative listed here — the synthetic training dataset remains available for practice either way.

Data used in this course

Base mapping and street networks
Access: Varies by jurisdiction
What you need: A base map of roads, footways, buildings, water features and place names covering the study area.
Why it is required: Every site plan, constraints plan and analysis drawing needs a locational base so the reader can orient the proposal against real streets, blocks and landmarks.
Preferred source: The national mapping agency of the country in which the site sits — National mapping agency. National mapping agencies publish the most positionally reliable base mapping. Access and licensing differ by country: some publish open products, others license mapping commercially or to registered professionals only. Confirm the terms with the agency before reuse.
Alternative: OpenStreetMap — OpenStreetMap Foundation and its contributors. Global, openly licensed and editable. Completeness varies sharply between areas.
Alternative: Geofabrik OpenStreetMap extracts — Geofabrik GmbH. Country and region extracts of OpenStreetMap data in GIS-ready formats.
Licence: OpenStreetMap data is published under the Open Database Licence (ODbL) 1.0. National mapping agency products carry their own licence, which is often not open.
Permitted reuse: ODbL permits copying, adaptation and commercial use provided the source is attributed and any distributed derivative database is shared under the same licence. This share-alike condition is a real obligation on consultancy deliverables that distribute data, so read it before use. Agency mapping may prohibit reuse entirely without a licence.
Required attribution: For OpenStreetMap: "© OpenStreetMap contributors", with a reference to the ODbL. Agency mapping must carry the credit wording that agency specifies.
Date, version and coverage: OpenStreetMap is continuously edited, so record the extraction date. Coverage is global. Agency mapping has a stated revision cycle and covers that country only.
Scale, accuracy and limitations: OpenStreetMap has no guaranteed positional accuracy, no consistent capture scale and uneven attribute completeness; building footprints and address data are missing in many areas. It is suitable for context and analysis, not for boundary determination or measured survey.
How to access lawfully: View directly in the browser, or download a regional extract and open it in GIS software. Do not scrape the live map tiles in bulk.
How to cite: OpenStreetMap contributors (year) OpenStreetMap [dataset]. Extracted [date]. Licensed under ODbL 1.0. Available at openstreetmap.org.
Administrative boundaries
Access: Varies by jurisdiction
What you need: Boundaries of the country, state or region, local government area and ward or district containing the site.
Why it is required: Boundaries define which authority determines the application, which policies apply and how statistics are aggregated for the study area.
Preferred source: The national statistical office or national mapping agency of the country concerned — National statistical office. Official boundaries are the only defensible source for reporting, because they match the units used in published statistics.
Alternative: Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) common operational datasets — UN OCHA. Country administrative boundary sets, usually endorsed by the national authority. Licences differ per dataset.
Alternative: Natural Earth — Natural Earth. Small-scale global boundaries in the public domain. Suitable for context maps only.
Licence: Natural Earth is public domain. HDX datasets carry per-dataset licences, commonly Creative Commons. National datasets carry the publishing authority's terms.
Permitted reuse: Public-domain boundaries may be reused freely, including commercially. Creative Commons datasets require attribution and may add conditions. An authority's boundary file may be viewable online yet still not licensed for redistribution — check before including it in a deliverable.
Required attribution: Name the publishing authority and the dataset title in the map credit block, with the licence where one is stated.
Date, version and coverage: Boundaries change through reorganisation, so record the release year and confirm it is the version in force at the assessment date. Coverage is national.
Scale, accuracy and limitations: Generalised boundary files are drawn for cartography, not for legal boundary determination. Coastal and river boundaries are frequently simplified. Never use them to determine ownership or a legal limit.
How to access lawfully: Download from the publishing authority's open-data portal, or from HDX where the authority has released it there.
How to cite: [Publishing authority] (year) [Dataset title], version [x] [dataset]. Accessed [date]. Available at [official URL].
Aerial and satellite imagery
Access: Open access
What you need: Recent imagery of the site and its surroundings for context, land-use reading and change detection.
Why it is required: Imagery evidences existing site conditions, vegetation, access and surrounding development at a known date, which supports the appraisal narrative.
Preferred source: Copernicus Sentinel-2 imagery via the Copernicus Data Space Ecosystem — European Union / European Space Agency.
Alternative: USGS EarthExplorer (Landsat archive) — United States Geological Survey. Long historical archive, useful for change over decades.
Alternative: OpenAerialMap — Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team. Openly licensed aerial imagery contributed by others. Coverage is patchy.
Licence: Sentinel data is published under the Copernicus open and free data policy. Landsat products from USGS are in the public domain. OpenAerialMap imagery carries the licence chosen by each contributor, commonly CC BY 4.0.
Permitted reuse: Copernicus and USGS products may be reused, adapted and used commercially with attribution. Imagery viewed inside a commercial web-map viewer is a different matter entirely: being able to see it in a browser does not license you to export, trace or publish it.
Required attribution: "Contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data [year]" for Sentinel; "Courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey" for Landsat; the contributor credit and licence for OpenAerialMap.
Date, version and coverage: Record the acquisition date of the specific scene, not the download date. Sentinel-2 revisits every few days globally; Landsat covers 1972 onwards.
Scale, accuracy and limitations: Sentinel-2 is 10–20 m ground resolution and Landsat is 30 m, so neither shows individual building detail. Cloud cover, shadow and seasonal vegetation change all affect interpretation. Imagery is not a survey and must not be measured from as though it were.
How to access lawfully: Register a free account with the provider, search by area and date, filter by cloud cover, then download the scene. Do not download tiles from a commercial basemap outside its terms.
How to cite: European Union / ESA / Copernicus (year) Sentinel-2 scene [ID], acquired [date] [satellite image]. Accessed [date].
Elevation and terrain
Access: Open access
What you need: A digital elevation model for slope, aspect, drainage direction and levels context.
Why it is required: Slope and drainage govern developable area, road gradients, earthworks cost and surface-water risk, so terrain shapes the layout before anything is drawn.
Preferred source: Copernicus DEM via the Copernicus Data Space Ecosystem — European Union / European Space Agency.
Alternative: NASA SRTM via USGS EarthExplorer — NASA / USGS. Approximately 30 m global elevation, widely used for screening.
Alternative: OpenTopography — OpenTopography Facility. High-resolution lidar where a survey has been flown and released; coverage is limited and per-dataset licences apply.
Licence: SRTM products from USGS are public domain. Copernicus DEM instances are released under the Copernicus licence, which permits reuse with attribution. OpenTopography datasets carry the licence set by each data owner.
Permitted reuse: Reuse, adaptation and commercial use are permitted for the public-domain and Copernicus products with the required credit. Confirm the per-dataset terms on OpenTopography before including a lidar derivative in a paid deliverable.
Required attribution: Credit the mission and steward, for example "Contains modified Copernicus DEM data" or "SRTM data courtesy of NASA/USGS".
Date, version and coverage: SRTM was captured in 2000 and does not reflect later earthworks. Copernicus DEM is compiled from more recent acquisitions. Both are near-global; note the tile version.
Scale, accuracy and limitations: Global DEMs are roughly 30 m horizontal resolution with vertical error typically measured in metres, and they represent surface height including tree canopy and buildings, not bare ground. They are screening tools only and never a substitute for a topographic survey for design levels.
How to access lawfully: Register with the portal, select tiles covering the study area, download, then reproject into the local projected coordinate system before deriving slope.
How to cite: [Mission] (year) [Product name], tile [ID] [dataset]. Accessed [date]. Available at [official URL].
Land cover and land use
Access: Open access
What you need: A land-cover classification showing built-up area, cropland, vegetation, bare ground and water.
Why it is required: Land cover supports constraint mapping, loss-of-agricultural-land arguments, green-infrastructure analysis and the growth narrative in a settlement study.
Preferred source: ESA WorldCover — European Space Agency.
Alternative: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHSL) — European Commission Joint Research Centre. Built-up surface and settlement layers, useful for urbanisation trends.
Alternative: The land-use record of the local planning authority — Local planning authority. Where published, an authority's own land-use survey is more authoritative locally than any global product.
Licence: ESA WorldCover and GHSL products are published under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Local authority land-use records carry the authority's own terms and are often view-only.
Permitted reuse: CC BY 4.0 permits copying, adaptation and commercial use with attribution. A land-use map an authority displays on a public viewer may not be licensed for extraction — ask the authority for a data licence rather than digitising the screen.
Required attribution: Credit the producer, product name, year and the CC BY 4.0 licence in the map credit block.
Date, version and coverage: State the product year, for example WorldCover 2021. Coverage is global at that epoch, so it will not reflect development completed since.
Scale, accuracy and limitations: Global land cover is typically 10–100 m resolution with class accuracy in the region of 75–80 per cent, and it confuses similar classes such as bare ground and low-density development. Verify against imagery and a site visit before relying on any single pixel.
How to access lawfully: Download the tiles covering the study area from the producer's portal, or consume the published web service inside GIS software.
How to cite: [Producer] (year) [Product name] v[x] [dataset]. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. Accessed [date].
Population, housing and socio-economic statistics
Access: Varies by jurisdiction
What you need: Census or survey figures for population, households, household size, tenure, employment and deprivation for the study area.
Why it is required: Need assessments, demand forecasts, catchment tests and infrastructure sizing all rest on published population and household evidence rather than assertion.
Preferred source: The national statistical office of the country concerned — National statistical office. Census and official survey outputs are the defensible baseline because they are the figures an authority and an inspector will recognise.
Alternative: WorldPop — WorldPop, University of Southampton. Modelled gridded population where census small-area data is unavailable.
Alternative: UN Data — United Nations Statistics Division. Comparable national indicators for context and benchmarking.
Licence: WorldPop datasets are published under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. National statistical outputs carry the office's own terms; many are open with attribution, some restrict redistribution of microdata.
Permitted reuse: CC BY 4.0 statistics may be reused commercially with attribution. Microdata and small-area tables are often released only under a licence agreement or safeguarded access, and must never be re-identified or redistributed.
Required attribution: Cite the office, the table or dataset reference and the reference year beneath every derived table and chart.
Date, version and coverage: Record the census or survey reference year, not the download year, and state the geography level used, for example ward or enumeration area.
Scale, accuracy and limitations: Census data ages quickly between rounds, small-area figures may be rounded or suppressed to protect confidentiality, and modelled gridded population is an estimate that can be materially wrong at neighbourhood level. Do not present modelled counts as observed counts.
How to access lawfully: Download the published table or dataset from the statistical office's release page, or the gridded raster from the producer's portal.
How to cite: [Statistical office] (year) [Table or dataset title], reference year [year] [dataset]. Accessed [date]. Available at [official URL].
Transport networks and travel data
Access: Varies by jurisdiction
What you need: Road hierarchy, public transport stops and routes, timetables, walking and cycling networks, and traffic or patronage counts where published.
Why it is required: Accessibility analysis, parking justification, trip generation and active-travel proposals all require an evidenced network and service picture rather than assumption.
Preferred source: The transport authority or transport operator serving the study area — Transport authority. Many authorities publish schedule data in the GTFS format and count data on their open-data portal.
Alternative: OpenStreetMap transport network — OpenStreetMap Foundation and its contributors. Road, footway and cycleway geometry where an authority network is unavailable.
Alternative: Mobility Database — MobilityData. A catalogue of publicly available transport schedule feeds; each feed keeps its publisher's licence.
Licence: OpenStreetMap is ODbL 1.0. Authority feeds carry the publisher's own licence, frequently an open government licence but sometimes restricted to non-commercial or attribution-only use.
Permitted reuse: Check each feed individually. A timetable published for passenger information is not automatically licensed for redistribution inside a consultancy report or a commercial application, and ODbL share-alike applies if you distribute a derived database.
Required attribution: Credit the operator or authority and the feed name, and give the feed date, because services change frequently.
Date, version and coverage: Schedule feeds have an explicit validity period — state it. Count data must be dated and the count location identified.
Scale, accuracy and limitations: Scheduled service is not observed service; reliability, crowding and informal transport are usually absent. Counts represent a specific day and season. Informal and paratransit networks are often entirely unmapped, which materially affects analysis in many cities.
How to access lawfully: Download the published feed or dataset from the authority's open-data page, or extract the network from OpenStreetMap for the study area.
How to cite: [Authority or operator] (year) [Feed or dataset title], valid [dates] [dataset]. Accessed [date].
Environmental, flood and climate data
Access: Restricted access
What you need: Flood extents, watercourses, protected sites, air-quality monitoring and long-run climate normals for the study area.
Why it is required: Environmental constraints determine developable area, sequential and exception tests, mitigation requirements and the credibility of any concept plan.
Preferred source: The national environment agency or equivalent regulator for the country concerned — National environment agency. Regulator flood maps and designated-site registers are the only defensible source for a statutory constraint.
Alternative: Protected Planet (World Database on Protected Areas) — UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. Global protected-area boundaries. Terms of use restrict commercial redistribution — read them.
Alternative: WorldClim — WorldClim. Gridded historical climate normals for context, published for academic and other non-commercial use.
Licence: Regulator datasets carry the regulator's licence, often open with attribution but sometimes view-only. Protected Planet has its own terms of use with restrictions on commercial reuse. WorldClim is stated by its publisher as free for academic and other non-commercial use.
Permitted reuse: This is the category where free viewing is most often mistaken for free reuse. A flood map you can inspect on a regulator's public viewer may not be licensed for reproduction in a commercial report; request the licensed dataset instead. Do not use a non-commercial dataset in a paid deliverable.
Required attribution: Reproduce the regulator's required credit line verbatim, with the extract date, and state that the map is indicative unless the regulator says otherwise.
Date, version and coverage: Flood modelling is revised regularly, so record the extract date and the modelled scenario or return period. Climate normals state their baseline period.
Scale, accuracy and limitations: National flood maps are strategic-scale and do not account for local defences, culverts or site levels; a site-specific flood risk assessment is a separate exercise by a qualified specialist. Protected-area boundaries may be generalised. Climate grids are interpolated between stations.
How to access lawfully: Use the regulator's data download service where one exists, or request the dataset under its published data-request process. Do not digitise from a screenshot of a public viewer.
How to cite: [Regulator] (year) [Dataset title], scenario [x] [dataset]. Extracted [date]. Reproduced under [licence].
Cadastral, land-tenure and ownership information
Access: Paid or licensed
What you need: Parcel boundaries, plot numbers, registered interests and tenure status for the site and adjoining land.
Why it is required: Site extent, ransom strips, access rights and assembly risk cannot be assessed without knowing who holds what, and multi-ownership changes the phasing strategy.
Preferred source: The land registry or lands bureau with jurisdiction over the site — Land registry / lands bureau. Only the registry can confirm a registered interest. Many registries provide official searches for a fee.
Alternative: The local planning authority's public application register — Local planning authority. Site boundaries submitted with previous applications indicate extent, though never ownership.
Licence: Registry information is normally supplied under a licence for a stated purpose, and is frequently charged per title or per search.
Permitted reuse: Reuse is usually limited to the transaction or instruction for which the search was made. Redistributing register extracts, republishing parcel data or placing ownership information on a public website is commonly prohibited and may also breach data-protection law where an owner is a living individual.
Required attribution: State the registry, the title or parcel reference and the search date, and keep the extract itself in the confidential appendix rather than the public document.
Date, version and coverage: Registry information is correct only as at the search date and coverage is limited to registered land, which in many jurisdictions is a minority of all land.
Scale, accuracy and limitations: Registry boundaries are often general boundaries, not precise legal lines, and unregistered, customary or communal tenure may not appear at all. Never present a cadastral extract as a boundary determination.
How to access lawfully: Apply through the registry's official search service and pay the prescribed fee. Never use an unofficial copy, a scraped parcel dataset or a leaked register.
How to cite: [Land registry] (year) Official search of title [reference], searched [date]. Reproduced under licence.
Planning policy, allocations and application history
Access: Public, view-only
What you need: The adopted development plan and its policies map, supplementary guidance, site allocations and the planning history of the site and its neighbours.
Why it is required: Policy compliance is the test the proposal will be judged against, and nearby decisions show how the authority has actually applied that policy.
Preferred source: The local planning authority with jurisdiction over the site — Local planning authority. Most authorities publish the plan, the policies map and a searchable application register on their own website.
Alternative: The national or regional government planning portal for the country concerned — National or regional planning body. Where a local plan is unpublished, regional policy and national guidance still apply.
Licence: Policy documents are usually published for public inspection under the authority's copyright, with reuse terms that vary and are often limited to non-commercial reproduction with acknowledgement.
Permitted reuse: Quoting a policy with a citation is normal professional practice. Republishing whole documents, policies-map data layers or bulk application records generally requires the authority's permission, and scraping a register is not an acceptable substitute for asking.
Required attribution: Cite the authority, plan title, adoption date and the policy reference for every policy relied on.
Date, version and coverage: Plans are replaced and policies are superseded, so record the adoption date and confirm the plan is the one currently in force. Coverage is that authority's administrative area only.
Scale, accuracy and limitations: A published policies map may be indicative rather than definitive at parcel level, emerging plans carry limited weight, and the register may lag current decisions. Confirm anything decisive with the authority in writing.
How to access lawfully: Download the plan from the authority's website and search the application register by address or reference. Request the policies-map data layer from the authority if you need it in GIS.
How to cite: [Authority] (year) [Plan title], adopted [date], Policy [reference]. Available at [official URL] [accessed date].

Where no suitable public source exists in your jurisdiction, complete the exercise with the synthetic training dataset and record the data gap as a limitation in your report. Stating a limitation honestly is professional practice; inventing data is not.

Method and limitations

A suitability model is an argument, not a result. Separate exclusions from scores, source every threshold, test the weights and document the method so anyone can rebuild it.

The method taught here is jurisdiction-neutral professional practice. Statutory tests, validation lists, density and parking standards, open-space and drainage requirements, accessibility standards, consultation procedures and appeal routes differ by country and by authority. Local laws, policies and standards must be confirmed with the relevant authority before any of this method is applied to a real site. Nothing here is legal advice and no course confers a licence or a right to practise.

All example material is synthetic teaching data, publicly available information or Ideeplan-owned method. No client name, commissioned document, confidential project file or copyrighted third-party course material is used or distributed.

Register Interest is an expression of interest only. It creates no account, enrolment, reservation, payment or course access.

Enrolment status

Enrolment is not currently available. This course is still undergoing content, media and professional review.

Register Interest is an expression of interest only. It works without an account, creates no enrolment, no reserved place and no payment order.

Protected lessons, approved videos and approved resource files are not accessible. No protected file URL, signed link or download entitlement is created.

Payments are disabled. No price, checkout, payment provider, payment order or paid-course claim exists in the Academy.

Outstanding before enrolment could open

Outstanding — Professional content review is complete
Outstanding — Required videos recorded, reviewed and approved, or the course approved as written-only
Outstanding — Required practical resources approved and available
Outstanding — Learner terms approved
Outstanding — Privacy and data-handling requirements approved
Outstanding — Course availability explicitly enabled by an authorised administrator
Outstanding — Payment and refund terms approved (paid courses)
Outstanding — Payment provider configuration complete (where payment is required)
Outstanding — Authentication email delivery configured and tested
Outstanding — Protected content access tested
Outstanding — Approved delivery and support process in place

Review Written Course Content Register Interest Return to Academy Return to Planned Curriculum

Progress, assessment and certificates

Submission access is not currently available

Lesson and course progress tracking is not active. No progress record, completion percentage or completed lesson exists for any account, and no course can record progress until enrolment opens.

Practical assessments cannot be submitted. Submission access is not currently available: there is no active enrolment, no upload configuration and no authorised reviewer workflow in operation.

No assessment has been marked, reviewed, corrected or passed. Reviewer feedback, correction tasks and pass decisions are made by an authorised human reviewer and none exists.

No certificate is issued, approved or pending. A future Academy certificate would be a course-completion certificate only — not a professional licence, statutory qualification, accreditation or government-recognised award.

Certificate verification is disabled until a certificate is genuinely issued. No verification result is produced for any reference.

Assessment formats planned for the Academy

Written briefs, required deliverables and marking criteria are published inside the course content above for open review. None of them can be submitted or marked at present.

Practical planning task
GIS mapping exercise
Site-appraisal task
Feasibility assessment
CAD or drawing task
Revit coordination task
Planning-report task
Policy-assessment task
Transport or access analysis
Environmental or green-infrastructure exercise
Final course project

Outstanding before completion or a certificate could exist

Outstanding — Learner identity verified by an authorised member of staff
Outstanding — Learner holds a valid active or completed enrolment
Outstanding — All required lessons completed
Outstanding — All required practical assessments passed
Outstanding — A recorded assessment decision exists for every required task
Outstanding — All requested corrections completed
Outstanding — Course content professionally reviewed and signed off
Outstanding — Authorised reviewer has approved completion
Outstanding — Course certificate policy approved
Outstanding — Certificate wording approved by Ideeplan Consult
Outstanding — Course is officially available
Outstanding — Unique certificate numbering and a secure verification route configured

Practical resources

Resources for this course

13 resource records · 13 with a written preview · 0 with a file under preparation · Download access not yet enabled.

All demonstration material is synthetic, publicly licensed or owned by Ideeplan Consult and is labelled as demonstration material. No confidential client file, personal information, private agency document or unreleased project drawing is used.

Practical project brief
Sets the professional situation, the role the learner takes and what must be produced.
Written preview available — downloadable file not yet available
Resource type
Brief
Format
Written brief shown on this page
Status
Draft
Data classification
Ideeplan-owned demonstration material
Licence or ownership
Ideeplan Consult-owned teaching material. Free to read on this page; redistribution is not permitted.
Related deliverable
Site-suitability model package: map series, sensitivity results and reproducible method statement
Lessons supported
9 — One brief governs the whole course: every lesson exercise contributes to the same final deliverable.
Access
No account required — written preview is public
- A synthetic district with a written agency siting brief, full constraint and context data, and reference sites for validation.
- Your role: Spatial analyst producing a publicly scrutinised suitability model.
- Available information: Synthetic agency siting brief with requirements and exclusions.
- Available information: Terrain, transport, land-cover, utility, designation and settlement layers.
- Available information: Reference sites with known suitability outcomes.
- Available information: Ideeplan-owned criteria, weighting and QA templates.
- Required analysis: Criteria and exclusion specification with sourced thresholds.
- Required analysis: Standardisation and no-data treatment of all criterion layers.
- Required analysis: Weighted combination under at least two weighting approaches.
- Required analysis: Sensitivity analysis across three scenarios.
- Required analysis: Validation against reference sites.
Resource file not yet available. The written instructions on this page are complete and can be followed without any download, account, enrolment or payment.
Client-style instruction and problem statement
Gives the learner the instruction as a practitioner would receive it, and names the problem to be solved.
Written preview available — downloadable file not yet available
Resource type
Brief
Format
Written statement shown on this page
Status
Draft
Data classification
Ideeplan-owned demonstration material
Licence or ownership
Ideeplan Consult-owned teaching material. Free to read on this page; redistribution is not permitted.
Related deliverable
Site-suitability model package: map series, sensitivity results and reproducible method statement
Lessons supported
9 — Scenario framing applies to every lesson in the course.
Access
No account required — written preview is public
Module 1 learner worksheet — Module 1 — From brief to criteria
Lists the practical steps the learner carries out in this module, in order.
Written preview available — downloadable file not yet available
Resource type
Worksheet
Format
Written worksheet shown on this page
Status
Draft
Data classification
Ideeplan-owned demonstration material
Licence or ownership
Ideeplan Consult-owned teaching material. Free to read on this page; redistribution is not permitted.
Related deliverable
Criteria specification with exclusions, indicators, thresholds and sources.
Lessons supported
3 — Supports the 3 lessons in module 1, which build one shared output.
Access
No account required — written preview is public
- Exclusions versus scored criteria — Split the teaching brief into an exclusion list and a scored criteria list with a source for each.
- Choosing indicators and defensible thresholds — Define indicators and thresholds for six criteria and mark two where the indicator is a proxy with stated weakness.
- Scale, resolution and the analysis grid — Select and justify an analysis resolution, then document the resampling applied to each input.
Resource file not yet available. The written instructions on this page are complete and can be followed without any download, account, enrolment or payment.
Module 2 learner worksheet — Module 2 — Building, weighting and testing the model
Lists the practical steps the learner carries out in this module, in order.
Written preview available — downloadable file not yet available
Resource type
Worksheet
Format
Written worksheet shown on this page
Status
Draft
Data classification
Ideeplan-owned demonstration material
Licence or ownership
Ideeplan Consult-owned teaching material. Free to read on this page; redistribution is not permitted.
Related deliverable
Weighted suitability surface, sensitivity results and a validation table.
Lessons supported
3 — Supports the 3 lessons in module 2, which build one shared output.
Access
No account required — written preview is public
- Reclassification and standardisation — Standardise six criterion layers to a common scale and document the no-data treatment for each.
- Weighting methods and combination rules — Produce two suitability surfaces using different weighting approaches and compare their outputs spatially.
- Sensitivity analysis and validation — Run a sensitivity test across three weight scenarios, map the robustly suitable area and validate against the reference sites.
Resource file not yet available. The written instructions on this page are complete and can be followed without any download, account, enrolment or payment.
Module 3 learner worksheet — Module 3 — Quality assurance and defensible publication
Lists the practical steps the learner carries out in this module, in order.
Written preview available — downloadable file not yet available
Resource type
Worksheet
Format
Written worksheet shown on this page
Status
Draft
Data classification
Ideeplan-owned demonstration material
Licence or ownership
Ideeplan Consult-owned teaching material. Free to read on this page; redistribution is not permitted.
Related deliverable
Quality-assured suitability map series with a full method statement.
Lessons supported
3 — Supports the 3 lessons in module 3, which build one shared output.
Access
No account required — written preview is public
- Map quality assurance in practice — Run the QA checklist over five teaching maps containing planted faults and log every defect with a correction.
- Writing a method statement that can be repeated — Write a method statement complete enough for a colleague to rebuild the model unaided.
- Communicating suitability without overstating it — Produce the final map series with an uncertainty figure and write the caveats section.
Resource file not yet available. The written instructions on this page are complete and can be followed without any download, account, enrolment or payment.
Task checklist
Confirms every required piece of work has been produced before submission.
Written preview available — downloadable file not yet available
Resource type
Checklist
Format
Written checklist shown on this page
Status
Draft
Data classification
Ideeplan-owned demonstration material
Licence or ownership
Ideeplan Consult-owned teaching material. Free to read on this page; redistribution is not permitted.
Related deliverable
Site-suitability model package: map series, sensitivity results and reproducible method statement
Lessons supported
9 — A single task checklist tracks progress across all modules.
Access
No account required — written preview is public
- Criteria specification document.
- Suitability surface and robust-area map.
- Sensitivity and validation tables.
- Quality-assured numbered map series.
- Reproducible method statement with caveats.
Resource file not yet available. The written instructions on this page are complete and can be followed without any download, account, enrolment or payment.

Example data and drawing base

Synthetic agency siting brief, teaching designation and constraint layers, and an Ideeplan-owned criteria specification template. GIS exercises are planned around plain, checkable formats: CSV and clearly labelled local-grid JSON on the named grid IDP-LOCAL-GRID. GeoJSON is not used for local-grid training data because the format asserts WGS 84 degrees. No QGIS project file, GeoPackage or raster file is claimed.

Written preview available — downloadable file not yet available

Resource type: GIS exercise pack
Format: CSV and local-grid JSON (planned) — no GeoJSON, QGIS project, GeoPackage or raster file is claimed
Status: Planned
Data classification: Synthetic demonstration data
Licence or ownership: Synthetic demonstration material prepared by Ideeplan Consult. No client file, personal information, private agency document or unreleased project drawing is used.
Related deliverable: Site-suitability model package: map series, sensitivity results and reproducible method statement
Lessons supported: 9 — One demonstration data base is used by every lesson so results stay comparable.
Access: No account required — written preview is public

Demonstration data item	What it contains and how it is used
Data ownership and licence	Synthetic training data prepared and owned by Ideeplan Consult. It is fictional: it is not a real client project, a real site or a real location, and it must not be presented as one. Free to study on this page; redistribution is not permitted.
Module 1 input — Module 1 — From brief to criteria	Synthetic agency siting brief, teaching designation and constraint layers, and an Ideeplan-owned criteria specification template.
Module 2 input — Module 2 — Building, weighting and testing the model	Reclassified criterion layers from Module 1, an Ideeplan-owned weighting worksheet and a set of synthetic reference sites with known outcomes.
Module 3 input — Module 3 — Quality assurance and defensible publication	Ideeplan-owned map QA checklist, method-statement template and a teaching set of deliberately flawed output maps.
Lawful sourcing where real data is substituted	Where a learner substitutes real data, use only openly licensed or lawfully obtained sources, record the publisher, dataset title, version and access date, and cite them in the final deliverable. Do not use restricted, confidential or personal data.

Resource file not yet available. The written instructions on this page are complete and can be followed without any download, account, enrolment or payment.

Analysis and calculation template
Structures the analysis so assumptions are visible and checkable. Any figures used in a template are teaching assumptions, not market evidence. Local costs, policies, standards and valuation assumptions must be independently confirmed before any of this is applied to a real project.
Written preview available — downloadable file not yet available
Resource type
Suitability matrix
Format
CSV matrix (planned)
Status
Planned
Data classification
Synthetic demonstration data
Licence or ownership
Ideeplan Consult-owned teaching material. Free to read on this page; redistribution is not permitted.
Related deliverable
Site-suitability model package: map series, sensitivity results and reproducible method statement
Lessons supported
9 — The same analysis structure is completed progressively through the course.
Access
No account required — written preview is public
- Record every assumption on its own labelled row, with the source or reason beside it.
- Module 1 working section — Criteria specification with exclusions, indicators, thresholds and sources.
- Module 2 working section — Weighted suitability surface, sensitivity results and a validation table.
- Module 3 working section — Quality-assured suitability map series with a full method statement.
- Required output carried into the analysis — Criteria specification document.
- Required output carried into the analysis — Suitability surface and robust-area map.
- Required output carried into the analysis — Sensitivity and validation tables.
- Required output carried into the analysis — Quality-assured numbered map series.
- Required output carried into the analysis — Reproducible method statement with caveats.
- Check row: totals, units and areas reconcile before the result is carried into the deliverable.
Resource file not yet available. The written instructions on this page are complete and can be followed without any download, account, enrolment or payment.
Final deliverable template
Sets the expected structure and presentation standard for Site-suitability model package: map series, sensitivity results and reproducible method statement.
Written preview available — downloadable file not yet available
Resource type
Planning-report template
Format
Structured document outline (planned)
Status
Planned
Data classification
Ideeplan-owned demonstration material
Licence or ownership
Ideeplan Consult-owned teaching material. Free to read on this page; redistribution is not permitted.
Related deliverable
Site-suitability model package: map series, sensitivity results and reproducible method statement
Lessons supported
9 — The final deliverable draws on every module output.
Access
No account required — written preview is public
- Final named deliverable — Site-suitability model package: map series, sensitivity results and reproducible method statement
- Section 1 — Criteria specification with exclusions, indicators, thresholds and sources.
- Section 2 — Weighted suitability surface, sensitivity results and a validation table.
- Section 3 — Quality-assured suitability map series with a full method statement.
- Must be present — Criteria specification document.
- Must be present — Suitability surface and robust-area map.
- Must be present — Sensitivity and validation tables.
- Must be present — Quality-assured numbered map series.
- Must be present — Reproducible method statement with caveats.
- Presentation and submission standard — Every parameter documented, no-data shown explicitly, class breaks justified, and outputs described as relative screening rather than decisions.
- Sources and citations: list every dataset, publisher, version and access date used, and state clearly where synthetic Ideeplan training data was used.
Resource file not yet available. The written instructions on this page are complete and can be followed without any download, account, enrolment or payment.
Quality-control checklist
Professional checks to run before the work is treated as finished.
Written preview available — downloadable file not yet available
Resource type
Checklist
Format
Written checklist shown on this page
Status
Draft
Data classification
Ideeplan-owned demonstration material
Licence or ownership
Ideeplan Consult-owned teaching material. Free to read on this page; redistribution is not permitted.
Related deliverable
Site-suitability model package: map series, sensitivity results and reproducible method statement
Lessons supported
9 — Quality control is applied to the whole submission, not to a single lesson.
Access
No account required — written preview is public
- Exclusions and scored criteria are held in separate layers.
- No-data cells are never scored as suitable.
- Every weight has a recorded source and rationale.
- Sensitivity results accompany every published suitability map.
- Local siting standards, designation rules, data licences and technical requirements are confirmed with the relevant authority before the model informs any decision.
Resource file not yet available. The written instructions on this page are complete and can be followed without any download, account, enrolment or payment.

Marking and review rubric

States what a satisfactory professional standard looks like for each criterion.

Written preview available — downloadable file not yet available

Resource type: Marking rubric
Format: Written rubric shown on this page
Status: Draft
Data classification: Ideeplan-owned demonstration material
Licence or ownership: Ideeplan Consult-owned teaching material. Free to read on this page; redistribution is not permitted.
Related deliverable: Site-suitability model package: map series, sensitivity results and reproducible method statement
Lessons supported: 9 — One rubric reviews the final deliverable produced across all modules.
Access: No account required — written preview is public

Criterion	Satisfactory standard
Criteria discipline	Exclusions and scored criteria are separated and each threshold cites a source.
Transparency	Weights, tools and parameters are recorded well enough to rebuild the model.
Robustness testing	Sensitivity analysis is run and unstable areas are identified.
Map quality	All planted QA faults are detected and the final series is defect free.
Appropriate claims	Outputs are presented as a screening filter with stated uncertainty.

Resource file not yet available. The written instructions on this page are complete and can be followed without any download, account, enrolment or payment.

Correction-task sheet
Common professional mistakes and the correction the learner practises.
Written preview available — downloadable file not yet available
Resource type
Correction-task sheet
Format
Written task sheet shown on this page
Status
Draft
Data classification
Ideeplan-owned demonstration material
Licence or ownership
Ideeplan Consult-owned teaching material. Free to read on this page; redistribution is not permitted.
Related deliverable
Site-suitability model package: map series, sensitivity results and reproducible method statement
Lessons supported
9 — Correction tasks address mistakes that can appear anywhere in the course.
Access
No account required — written preview is public
- Applying equal weights and describing the model as objective. — Record equal weighting as a deliberate choice, state its effect and run a sensitivity comparison.
- Letting no-data areas appear as moderately suitable. — Mask no-data explicitly, show it in the legend and recompute the suitable-area statistics.
- Modelling at a resolution finer than the coarsest input supports. — Resample the analysis grid to a defensible resolution and rerun the model.
- Publishing a single surface with no method statement. — Document every parameter and reissue the package with the method statement attached.
Resource file not yet available. The written instructions on this page are complete and can be followed without any download, account, enrolment or payment.
Submission guidance
How the finished work should be assembled and presented for professional review.
Written preview available — downloadable file not yet available
Resource type
Checklist
Format
Written guidance shown on this page
Status
Draft
Data classification
Ideeplan-owned demonstration material
Licence or ownership
Ideeplan Consult-owned teaching material. Free to read on this page; redistribution is not permitted.
Related deliverable
Site-suitability model package: map series, sensitivity results and reproducible method statement
Lessons supported
9 — Submission guidance covers the single final deliverable.
Access
No account required — written preview is public

Media status

Video lessons for this course

Video lessons: Video lesson: Not recorded — authentic professional recording required.
Narration: Professional narration — planned, not produced
Captions: Not yet produced
Transcript: Not yet produced
Software demonstration: Genuine screen capture from the real application only — no mockup, simulated interface or AI-generated screen.
Software version and operating system: No software version is published until it has been read from the actual recorded session. Until then the version reads “To be stated from the recorded session”.
Production plan: Prepared for professional review
Enrolment, payment and downloads: Disabled

Video lesson: Not recorded — authentic professional recording required. The written lesson on this page is complete and can be read in full without a video, an account, enrolment or payment.

Authentic software screen capture only — non-negotiable standard

Applies to every software demonstrated in the Academy, including AutoCAD, QGIS, Revit, ArcGIS, SketchUp, Lumion, Civil 3D, Rhino and any other software used. The final video must accurately represent what a learner sees when using the stated software version.

Every demonstration is a genuine screen recording or screenshot captured from the actual installed software being taught.
The exact software name, version, operating system and relevant workspace are stated on screen and in the lesson notes, as read from the recorded session.
The real interface is shown: menus, panels, toolbars, properties, layer controls, settings and the command line or log.
The real cursor, tool selection, commands, settings and the resulting output are visible.
Capture is 16:9 and readable at 720p, with clear, unhurried cursor movement; the screen stays clear enough for learners to follow.
The view zooms in whenever text, settings, coordinates or field values would otherwise be hard to read.
The exact command, menu path or tool name is shown as it appears in the software.
Useful keyboard shortcuts are shown alongside the menu path, never instead of it.
Differences between software versions or operating systems are stated wherever the interface may display differently.
Steps are numbered on screen, with callouts pointing at the actual control being used.
Any annotation is added only after recording and must never alter or misrepresent the software interface.
Captions and a complete transcript are produced before professional review.
Any presenter window stays small, is positioned clear of technical content, and is hidden on mobile widths and on dense technical screens.

Interface visibility on every recording

The full application interface is shown at the beginning of every demonstration, with the application identity and exact version clearly visible.
The relevant menu bar, ribbon, toolbar or toolbox stays visible while each step is explained; the interface context is never cropped away.
Layers, properties, project browser or data panels are shown wherever applicable.
The command line, status bar or coordinate/CRS information is shown wherever relevant.
Real cursor movement and visible clicks are captured, with visible cursor highlighting or click indicators.
The selected tool and its effect are visible, and complete dialog boxes and settings are shown whenever one is opened.
The resulting drawing, map, model or output is shown in the recording.
Zoom is used only when necessary for small text or settings, always retaining enough context to identify the application and tool in use.
The standard applies to every software course and is verified before any video is marked recorded or approved; if the required authentic interface is not visible, the lesson remains “Video lesson: Not recorded — authentic professional recording required.”

Never used

Generic website mockups standing in for a software workspace.
Simulated, redrawn, reconstructed or redesigned replica interfaces for any software.
AI-generated software screens, panels, dialogs or map canvases.
Generic illustrations replacing the real interface.
Unverified screenshots taken from any source other than the recorded session.
Fake video players, placeholder thumbnails or invented durations.
Invented menus, tool names, command names, dialog options or keyboard shortcuts.
Hiding important controls or covering them with a presenter window.
Annotations that alter or misrepresent the recorded software interface.
Claiming or implying that a simulated screen is an authentic software demonstration.

QGIS — what the recording must show

Exact QGIS version to be stated from the recorded session. Operating system to be stated from the recorded session; menu positions and file dialogs differ between systems.

1.Project CRS: Project Properties, the CRS tab and the selected coordinate reference system.
2.Layer loading: the Data Source Manager or Browser panel and the layer added to the canvas.
3.Layer properties: the Layer Properties dialog and each tab used in the lesson.
4.Symbology: the Symbology tab with the real renderer, classes and colour settings.
5.Attribute tables: the attribute table, field values, selection and expression use.
6.Processing tools: the Processing Toolbox with the tool searched and opened by its real name.
7.Analysis settings: every parameter in the tool dialog, including output location.
8.Map layout: the Print Layout window, page setup and map item.
9.Legend, scale and north arrow: each item added from the real layout toolbar.
10.Export and quality checks: the export dialog settings and a check of the exported file.

No authentic software recording or screenshot exists yet. Every software lesson remains “Video lesson: Not recorded — authentic professional recording required.”

Real professional classroom experience — every lesson

Applies to every future Academy lesson, software-based or not. The finished lesson presents as authentic professional training, professionally narrated and screen-led: video + written guide + supporting data + practical task + quality checklist + final named deliverable.

Lesson structure

1.Professional introduction.
2.Realistic project situation.
3.Learner role within that situation.
4.Problem statement.
5.Learning objectives.
6.Required software and data.
7.Step-by-step demonstration.
8.Explanation of the professional reasoning behind each action.
9.Practical learner task.
10.Checkpoint or pause activity.
11.Common mistake and its correction.
12.Quality-control review.
13.Final recap.
14.Named learner deliverable.

Video requirements

Professional narration that is clear, natural and paced for instruction, synchronised with the screen action.
Authentic screen recording from the actual software, with visible menus, tools, panels, commands, settings and outputs.
Natural cursor movement and deliberate pacing, with a clear explanation of why each action is taken.
Realistic corrections and troubleshooting shown, not edited away.
Clear 16:9 screen capture.
Captions and a complete transcript.
Chapter titles and lesson sections.
A small presenter window only where useful; it never covers technical content and is hidden on mobile or dense technical screens.

Never produced as a lesson

Automated slideshows.
Generic screen tours.
Silent software demonstrations.
Marketing videos presented as lessons.
AI-avatar presentations.
Simulated software tutorials.
Fast montages without explanation.
An invented tutor, instructor identity, voice, recording, thumbnail or completion status.

Lessons use only synthetic, publicly licensed or Ideeplan-owned examples. No confidential client information is used.

No genuine professional recording exists yet. Until one does, every lesson remains “Video lesson: Not recorded — authentic professional recording required.” Enrolment, payments, certificates and protected learner access stay disabled during this production stage.

Professional narration and screen-first production

Every Academy lesson is planned as a professionally narrated, screen-led practical lesson with captions and a complete transcript.
No AI avatar, virtual presenter or artificial talking head is used, and no named person is imitated. No lesson is described as human-narrated, instructor-led by a named person or personally presented unless that is factually true.
No instructor identity is published until a real, named professional has recorded and approved the lesson.
Recordings are screen-first: the GIS view, planning drawing, AutoCAD or Revit workspace or document remains the main subject of the frame.
Any presenter picture-in-picture normally occupies about 8–10% of the frame, never covers technical content, and is reduced or hidden on small screens.
The Principal Consultant portrait is reserved for approved introductions and conclusions. It is never used as a repeated course thumbnail, and the Academy remains company-first.

No lesson has been recorded and no narration has been produced. Scripts exist as production plans only, and every lesson video status remains “Not recorded”.

Demonstration material is synthetic, publicly licensed or owned by Ideeplan Consult. No confidential client file, unauthorised agency dataset or private project information is used.

Methods are jurisdiction-neutral. Learners must confirm local laws, policies and technical standards before applying them to a real project.

A production plan describes how a lesson would be recorded. It is not a recording, and it does not create an enrolment, account, payment or reserved place.

9 lesson production plans · suggested recording time about 90 minutes in total (a planning estimate, not a recorded duration) · every lesson video status: Not recorded.

Lesson 1 · Video lesson: Not recorded — authentic professional recording required.
Exclusions versus scored criteria
Learning objective
Separating absolute exclusions from criteria that vary in degree, why mixing them corrupts a model, and how to document an exclusion so it can be audited or reversed.
Narration focus
Convert a written siting requirement into a defensible, measurable criteria framework.
Screen action
Split the teaching brief into an exclusion list and a scored criteria list with a source for each.
Required software
QGIS, Spreadsheet software, Word processor
Example data
Synthetic agency siting brief, teaching designation and constraint layers, and an Ideeplan-owned criteria specification template.
Expected learner output
No absolute requirement is expressed as a score, and no preference is expressed as an exclusion.
Suggested length
About 8 minutes (planning estimate)
Captions and transcript
Required before professional review
Narration
Professional narration — not yet produced
Demonstration sequence
1. 1.Separating absolute exclusions from criteria that vary in degree, why mixing them corrupts a model, and how to document an exclusion so it can be audited or reversed.
2. 2.Split the teaching brief into an exclusion list and a scored criteria list with a source for each.
3. 3.No absolute requirement is expressed as a score, and no preference is expressed as an exclusion.
Quality review checklist
- Technical content (map, drawing, model or document) fills the majority of the frame and stays legible at 720p.
- Presenter picture-in-picture, if used, stays at roughly 8–10% of the frame, never covers legends, dimensions, labels or annotations, and is hidden on mobile widths and dense technical screens.
- Software shown is limited to QGIS, Spreadsheet software, Word processor, with no suggestion of provider endorsement.
- Capture is a genuine screen recording from the real application — no mockup, simulated interface, AI-generated screen or unverified screenshot.
- The exact software name, version and, where relevant, operating system are read from the recorded session and stated on screen.
- Menus, panels, toolbars, layer controls and the command line or log are visible and legible; the view zooms in wherever text, settings or coordinates would be hard to read.
- The full application interface is shown at the beginning; menus, tools and panels stay visible throughout and the interface context is never cropped away, with zoom retaining enough context to identify the application and tool.
- Real cursor movement with visible highlighting or click indicators is captured; the selected tool, its effect, complete dialogs and the resulting output are all shown.
- The exact command, menu path or tool name is shown as it appears in the software, with useful keyboard shortcuts alongside it and alternative locations explained for other versions.
- Numbered on-screen steps and callouts point at the real controls being used; no menu, tool or command is invented.
- Until an authentic recording exists the lesson reads: “Video lesson: Not recorded — authentic professional recording required.”
- All data on screen is synthetic, publicly licensed or Ideeplan-owned, and is labelled as demonstration data.
- Narration states that methods are jurisdiction-neutral and that local laws, policies and standards must be confirmed.
- Captions and a transcript are produced before the recording can move to professional review.
- No client name, confidential file or private project information appears on screen at any point.
Lesson 2 · Video lesson: Not recorded — authentic professional recording required.
Choosing indicators and defensible thresholds
Learning objective
Selecting an indicator that actually measures the criterion, setting thresholds from policy, standards or evidence rather than convenience, and handling criteria for which no good indicator exists.
Narration focus
Convert a written siting requirement into a defensible, measurable criteria framework.
Screen action
Define indicators and thresholds for six criteria and mark two where the indicator is a proxy with stated weakness.
Required software
QGIS, Spreadsheet software, Word processor
Example data
Synthetic agency siting brief, teaching designation and constraint layers, and an Ideeplan-owned criteria specification template.
Expected learner output
Every threshold cites a source and every proxy is labelled as one.
Suggested length
About 10 minutes (planning estimate)
Captions and transcript
Required before professional review
Narration
Professional narration — not yet produced
Demonstration sequence
1. 1.Selecting an indicator that actually measures the criterion, setting thresholds from policy, standards or evidence rather than convenience, and handling criteria for which no good indicator exists.
2. 2.Define indicators and thresholds for six criteria and mark two where the indicator is a proxy with stated weakness.
3. 3.Every threshold cites a source and every proxy is labelled as one.
Quality review checklist
- Technical content (map, drawing, model or document) fills the majority of the frame and stays legible at 720p.
- Presenter picture-in-picture, if used, stays at roughly 8–10% of the frame, never covers legends, dimensions, labels or annotations, and is hidden on mobile widths and dense technical screens.
- Software shown is limited to QGIS, Spreadsheet software, Word processor, with no suggestion of provider endorsement.
- Capture is a genuine screen recording from the real application — no mockup, simulated interface, AI-generated screen or unverified screenshot.
- The exact software name, version and, where relevant, operating system are read from the recorded session and stated on screen.
- Menus, panels, toolbars, layer controls and the command line or log are visible and legible; the view zooms in wherever text, settings or coordinates would be hard to read.
- The full application interface is shown at the beginning; menus, tools and panels stay visible throughout and the interface context is never cropped away, with zoom retaining enough context to identify the application and tool.
- Real cursor movement with visible highlighting or click indicators is captured; the selected tool, its effect, complete dialogs and the resulting output are all shown.
- The exact command, menu path or tool name is shown as it appears in the software, with useful keyboard shortcuts alongside it and alternative locations explained for other versions.
- Numbered on-screen steps and callouts point at the real controls being used; no menu, tool or command is invented.
- Until an authentic recording exists the lesson reads: “Video lesson: Not recorded — authentic professional recording required.”
- All data on screen is synthetic, publicly licensed or Ideeplan-owned, and is labelled as demonstration data.
- Narration states that methods are jurisdiction-neutral and that local laws, policies and standards must be confirmed.
- Captions and a transcript are produced before the recording can move to professional review.
- No client name, confidential file or private project information appears on screen at any point.
Lesson 3 · Video lesson: Not recorded — authentic professional recording required.
Scale, resolution and the analysis grid
Learning objective
Choosing an analysis resolution suited to the decision, the consequences of resampling, edge effects at the district boundary, and matching model resolution to the coarsest meaningful input.
Narration focus
Convert a written siting requirement into a defensible, measurable criteria framework.
Screen action
Select and justify an analysis resolution, then document the resampling applied to each input.
Required software
QGIS, Spreadsheet software, Word processor
Example data
Synthetic agency siting brief, teaching designation and constraint layers, and an Ideeplan-owned criteria specification template.
Expected learner output
Model resolution is no finer than the coarsest input can support.
Suggested length
About 12 minutes (planning estimate)
Captions and transcript
Required before professional review
Narration
Professional narration — not yet produced
Demonstration sequence
1. 1.Choosing an analysis resolution suited to the decision, the consequences of resampling, edge effects at the district boundary, and matching model resolution to the coarsest meaningful input.
2. 2.Select and justify an analysis resolution, then document the resampling applied to each input.
3. 3.Model resolution is no finer than the coarsest input can support.
Quality review checklist
- Technical content (map, drawing, model or document) fills the majority of the frame and stays legible at 720p.
- Presenter picture-in-picture, if used, stays at roughly 8–10% of the frame, never covers legends, dimensions, labels or annotations, and is hidden on mobile widths and dense technical screens.
- Software shown is limited to QGIS, Spreadsheet software, Word processor, with no suggestion of provider endorsement.
- Capture is a genuine screen recording from the real application — no mockup, simulated interface, AI-generated screen or unverified screenshot.
- The exact software name, version and, where relevant, operating system are read from the recorded session and stated on screen.
- Menus, panels, toolbars, layer controls and the command line or log are visible and legible; the view zooms in wherever text, settings or coordinates would be hard to read.
- The full application interface is shown at the beginning; menus, tools and panels stay visible throughout and the interface context is never cropped away, with zoom retaining enough context to identify the application and tool.
- Real cursor movement with visible highlighting or click indicators is captured; the selected tool, its effect, complete dialogs and the resulting output are all shown.
- The exact command, menu path or tool name is shown as it appears in the software, with useful keyboard shortcuts alongside it and alternative locations explained for other versions.
- Numbered on-screen steps and callouts point at the real controls being used; no menu, tool or command is invented.
- Until an authentic recording exists the lesson reads: “Video lesson: Not recorded — authentic professional recording required.”
- All data on screen is synthetic, publicly licensed or Ideeplan-owned, and is labelled as demonstration data.
- Narration states that methods are jurisdiction-neutral and that local laws, policies and standards must be confirmed.
- Captions and a transcript are produced before the recording can move to professional review.
- No client name, confidential file or private project information appears on screen at any point.
Lesson 4 · Video lesson: Not recorded — authentic professional recording required.
Reclassification and standardisation
Learning objective
Bringing criteria onto a common scale, linear versus stepped standardisation, handling no-data honestly, and why a no-data cell must never silently score as suitable.
Narration focus
Produce the suitability surface and prove it is not an accident of the weights.
Screen action
Standardise six criterion layers to a common scale and document the no-data treatment for each.
Required software
QGIS, Spreadsheet software, Word processor
Example data
Reclassified criterion layers from Module 1, an Ideeplan-owned weighting worksheet and a set of synthetic reference sites with known outcomes.
Expected learner output
No-data areas are visible in the output rather than absorbed into a score.
Suggested length
About 8 minutes (planning estimate)
Captions and transcript
Required before professional review
Narration
Professional narration — not yet produced
Demonstration sequence
1. 1.Bringing criteria onto a common scale, linear versus stepped standardisation, handling no-data honestly, and why a no-data cell must never silently score as suitable.
2. 2.Standardise six criterion layers to a common scale and document the no-data treatment for each.
3. 3.No-data areas are visible in the output rather than absorbed into a score.
Quality review checklist
- Technical content (map, drawing, model or document) fills the majority of the frame and stays legible at 720p.
- Presenter picture-in-picture, if used, stays at roughly 8–10% of the frame, never covers legends, dimensions, labels or annotations, and is hidden on mobile widths and dense technical screens.
- Software shown is limited to QGIS, Spreadsheet software, Word processor, with no suggestion of provider endorsement.
- Capture is a genuine screen recording from the real application — no mockup, simulated interface, AI-generated screen or unverified screenshot.
- The exact software name, version and, where relevant, operating system are read from the recorded session and stated on screen.
- Menus, panels, toolbars, layer controls and the command line or log are visible and legible; the view zooms in wherever text, settings or coordinates would be hard to read.
- The full application interface is shown at the beginning; menus, tools and panels stay visible throughout and the interface context is never cropped away, with zoom retaining enough context to identify the application and tool.
- Real cursor movement with visible highlighting or click indicators is captured; the selected tool, its effect, complete dialogs and the resulting output are all shown.
- The exact command, menu path or tool name is shown as it appears in the software, with useful keyboard shortcuts alongside it and alternative locations explained for other versions.
- Numbered on-screen steps and callouts point at the real controls being used; no menu, tool or command is invented.
- Until an authentic recording exists the lesson reads: “Video lesson: Not recorded — authentic professional recording required.”
- All data on screen is synthetic, publicly licensed or Ideeplan-owned, and is labelled as demonstration data.
- Narration states that methods are jurisdiction-neutral and that local laws, policies and standards must be confirmed.
- Captions and a transcript are produced before the recording can move to professional review.
- No client name, confidential file or private project information appears on screen at any point.
Lesson 5 · Video lesson: Not recorded — authentic professional recording required.
Weighting methods and combination rules
Learning objective
Equal weighting, expert-derived weights and pairwise comparison; weighted sum against constraint-limited combination; documenting who set the weights and on what basis.
Narration focus
Produce the suitability surface and prove it is not an accident of the weights.
Screen action
Produce two suitability surfaces using different weighting approaches and compare their outputs spatially.
Required software
QGIS, Spreadsheet software, Word processor
Example data
Reclassified criterion layers from Module 1, an Ideeplan-owned weighting worksheet and a set of synthetic reference sites with known outcomes.
Expected learner output
The weight source is recorded and both surfaces are reported, not just the preferred one.
Suggested length
About 10 minutes (planning estimate)
Captions and transcript
Required before professional review
Narration
Professional narration — not yet produced
Demonstration sequence
1. 1.Equal weighting, expert-derived weights and pairwise comparison; weighted sum against constraint-limited combination; documenting who set the weights and on what basis.
2. 2.Produce two suitability surfaces using different weighting approaches and compare their outputs spatially.
3. 3.The weight source is recorded and both surfaces are reported, not just the preferred one.
Quality review checklist
- Technical content (map, drawing, model or document) fills the majority of the frame and stays legible at 720p.
- Presenter picture-in-picture, if used, stays at roughly 8–10% of the frame, never covers legends, dimensions, labels or annotations, and is hidden on mobile widths and dense technical screens.
- Software shown is limited to QGIS, Spreadsheet software, Word processor, with no suggestion of provider endorsement.
- Capture is a genuine screen recording from the real application — no mockup, simulated interface, AI-generated screen or unverified screenshot.
- The exact software name, version and, where relevant, operating system are read from the recorded session and stated on screen.
- Menus, panels, toolbars, layer controls and the command line or log are visible and legible; the view zooms in wherever text, settings or coordinates would be hard to read.
- The full application interface is shown at the beginning; menus, tools and panels stay visible throughout and the interface context is never cropped away, with zoom retaining enough context to identify the application and tool.
- Real cursor movement with visible highlighting or click indicators is captured; the selected tool, its effect, complete dialogs and the resulting output are all shown.
- The exact command, menu path or tool name is shown as it appears in the software, with useful keyboard shortcuts alongside it and alternative locations explained for other versions.
- Numbered on-screen steps and callouts point at the real controls being used; no menu, tool or command is invented.
- Until an authentic recording exists the lesson reads: “Video lesson: Not recorded — authentic professional recording required.”
- All data on screen is synthetic, publicly licensed or Ideeplan-owned, and is labelled as demonstration data.
- Narration states that methods are jurisdiction-neutral and that local laws, policies and standards must be confirmed.
- Captions and a transcript are produced before the recording can move to professional review.
- No client name, confidential file or private project information appears on screen at any point.
Lesson 6 · Video lesson: Not recorded — authentic professional recording required.
Sensitivity analysis and validation
Learning objective
Varying weights systematically to find which criteria drive the result, identifying areas that are suitable under every scenario, and testing the model against reference sites with known suitability.
Narration focus
Produce the suitability surface and prove it is not an accident of the weights.
Screen action
Run a sensitivity test across three weight scenarios, map the robustly suitable area and validate against the reference sites.
Required software
QGIS, Spreadsheet software, Word processor
Example data
Reclassified criterion layers from Module 1, an Ideeplan-owned weighting worksheet and a set of synthetic reference sites with known outcomes.
Expected learner output
The report identifies which criterion most influences the outcome and where the model is unstable.
Suggested length
About 12 minutes (planning estimate)
Captions and transcript
Required before professional review
Narration
Professional narration — not yet produced
Demonstration sequence
1. 1.Varying weights systematically to find which criteria drive the result, identifying areas that are suitable under every scenario, and testing the model against reference sites with known suitability.
2. 2.Run a sensitivity test across three weight scenarios, map the robustly suitable area and validate against the reference sites.
3. 3.The report identifies which criterion most influences the outcome and where the model is unstable.
Quality review checklist
- Technical content (map, drawing, model or document) fills the majority of the frame and stays legible at 720p.
- Presenter picture-in-picture, if used, stays at roughly 8–10% of the frame, never covers legends, dimensions, labels or annotations, and is hidden on mobile widths and dense technical screens.
- Software shown is limited to QGIS, Spreadsheet software, Word processor, with no suggestion of provider endorsement.
- Capture is a genuine screen recording from the real application — no mockup, simulated interface, AI-generated screen or unverified screenshot.
- The exact software name, version and, where relevant, operating system are read from the recorded session and stated on screen.
- Menus, panels, toolbars, layer controls and the command line or log are visible and legible; the view zooms in wherever text, settings or coordinates would be hard to read.
- The full application interface is shown at the beginning; menus, tools and panels stay visible throughout and the interface context is never cropped away, with zoom retaining enough context to identify the application and tool.
- Real cursor movement with visible highlighting or click indicators is captured; the selected tool, its effect, complete dialogs and the resulting output are all shown.
- The exact command, menu path or tool name is shown as it appears in the software, with useful keyboard shortcuts alongside it and alternative locations explained for other versions.
- Numbered on-screen steps and callouts point at the real controls being used; no menu, tool or command is invented.
- Until an authentic recording exists the lesson reads: “Video lesson: Not recorded — authentic professional recording required.”
- All data on screen is synthetic, publicly licensed or Ideeplan-owned, and is labelled as demonstration data.
- Narration states that methods are jurisdiction-neutral and that local laws, policies and standards must be confirmed.
- Captions and a transcript are produced before the recording can move to professional review.
- No client name, confidential file or private project information appears on screen at any point.
Lesson 7 · Video lesson: Not recorded — authentic professional recording required.
Map quality assurance in practice
Learning objective
A systematic QA pass: projection, extent, classification breaks, legend accuracy, label collisions, greyscale and colour-vision legibility, scale honesty, and consistency between map, table and text.
Narration focus
Check the model like an auditor would, then publish so the method can be repeated.
Screen action
Run the QA checklist over five teaching maps containing planted faults and log every defect with a correction.
Required software
QGIS, Spreadsheet software, Word processor
Example data
Ideeplan-owned map QA checklist, method-statement template and a teaching set of deliberately flawed output maps.
Expected learner output
All planted faults are found and each is recorded with a specific remedy.
Suggested length
About 8 minutes (planning estimate)
Captions and transcript
Required before professional review
Narration
Professional narration — not yet produced
Demonstration sequence
1. 1.A systematic QA pass: projection, extent, classification breaks, legend accuracy, label collisions, greyscale and colour-vision legibility, scale honesty, and consistency between map, table and text.
2. 2.Run the QA checklist over five teaching maps containing planted faults and log every defect with a correction.
3. 3.All planted faults are found and each is recorded with a specific remedy.
Quality review checklist
- Technical content (map, drawing, model or document) fills the majority of the frame and stays legible at 720p.
- Presenter picture-in-picture, if used, stays at roughly 8–10% of the frame, never covers legends, dimensions, labels or annotations, and is hidden on mobile widths and dense technical screens.
- Software shown is limited to QGIS, Spreadsheet software, Word processor, with no suggestion of provider endorsement.
- Capture is a genuine screen recording from the real application — no mockup, simulated interface, AI-generated screen or unverified screenshot.
- The exact software name, version and, where relevant, operating system are read from the recorded session and stated on screen.
- Menus, panels, toolbars, layer controls and the command line or log are visible and legible; the view zooms in wherever text, settings or coordinates would be hard to read.
- The full application interface is shown at the beginning; menus, tools and panels stay visible throughout and the interface context is never cropped away, with zoom retaining enough context to identify the application and tool.
- Real cursor movement with visible highlighting or click indicators is captured; the selected tool, its effect, complete dialogs and the resulting output are all shown.
- The exact command, menu path or tool name is shown as it appears in the software, with useful keyboard shortcuts alongside it and alternative locations explained for other versions.
- Numbered on-screen steps and callouts point at the real controls being used; no menu, tool or command is invented.
- Until an authentic recording exists the lesson reads: “Video lesson: Not recorded — authentic professional recording required.”
- All data on screen is synthetic, publicly licensed or Ideeplan-owned, and is labelled as demonstration data.
- Narration states that methods are jurisdiction-neutral and that local laws, policies and standards must be confirmed.
- Captions and a transcript are produced before the recording can move to professional review.
- No client name, confidential file or private project information appears on screen at any point.
Lesson 8 · Video lesson: Not recorded — authentic professional recording required.
Writing a method statement that can be repeated
Learning objective
Recording every input, threshold, reclassification, weight, tool and parameter so that an independent analyst reproduces the surface; version control; and documenting decisions that were judgement calls.
Narration focus
Check the model like an auditor would, then publish so the method can be repeated.
Screen action
Write a method statement complete enough for a colleague to rebuild the model unaided.
Required software
QGIS, Spreadsheet software, Word processor
Example data
Ideeplan-owned map QA checklist, method-statement template and a teaching set of deliberately flawed output maps.
Expected learner output
Every processing step and parameter appears with its value.
Suggested length
About 10 minutes (planning estimate)
Captions and transcript
Required before professional review
Narration
Professional narration — not yet produced
Demonstration sequence
1. 1.Recording every input, threshold, reclassification, weight, tool and parameter so that an independent analyst reproduces the surface; version control; and documenting decisions that were judgement calls.
2. 2.Write a method statement complete enough for a colleague to rebuild the model unaided.
3. 3.Every processing step and parameter appears with its value.
Quality review checklist
- Technical content (map, drawing, model or document) fills the majority of the frame and stays legible at 720p.
- Presenter picture-in-picture, if used, stays at roughly 8–10% of the frame, never covers legends, dimensions, labels or annotations, and is hidden on mobile widths and dense technical screens.
- Software shown is limited to QGIS, Spreadsheet software, Word processor, with no suggestion of provider endorsement.
- Capture is a genuine screen recording from the real application — no mockup, simulated interface, AI-generated screen or unverified screenshot.
- The exact software name, version and, where relevant, operating system are read from the recorded session and stated on screen.
- Menus, panels, toolbars, layer controls and the command line or log are visible and legible; the view zooms in wherever text, settings or coordinates would be hard to read.
- The full application interface is shown at the beginning; menus, tools and panels stay visible throughout and the interface context is never cropped away, with zoom retaining enough context to identify the application and tool.
- Real cursor movement with visible highlighting or click indicators is captured; the selected tool, its effect, complete dialogs and the resulting output are all shown.
- The exact command, menu path or tool name is shown as it appears in the software, with useful keyboard shortcuts alongside it and alternative locations explained for other versions.
- Numbered on-screen steps and callouts point at the real controls being used; no menu, tool or command is invented.
- Until an authentic recording exists the lesson reads: “Video lesson: Not recorded — authentic professional recording required.”
- All data on screen is synthetic, publicly licensed or Ideeplan-owned, and is labelled as demonstration data.
- Narration states that methods are jurisdiction-neutral and that local laws, policies and standards must be confirmed.
- Captions and a transcript are produced before the recording can move to professional review.
- No client name, confidential file or private project information appears on screen at any point.
Lesson 9 · Video lesson: Not recorded — authentic professional recording required.
Communicating suitability without overstating it
Learning objective
Presenting suitability as relative rather than absolute, avoiding false precision in class breaks, showing uncertainty and no-data areas, and framing outputs as a filter for further work rather than a decision.
Narration focus
Check the model like an auditor would, then publish so the method can be repeated.
Screen action
Produce the final map series with an uncertainty figure and write the caveats section.
Required software
QGIS, Spreadsheet software, Word processor
Example data
Ideeplan-owned map QA checklist, method-statement template and a teaching set of deliberately flawed output maps.
Expected learner output
The output is described as a screening filter, and no cell score is presented as a site decision.
Suggested length
About 12 minutes (planning estimate)
Captions and transcript
Required before professional review
Narration
Professional narration — not yet produced
Demonstration sequence
1. 1.Presenting suitability as relative rather than absolute, avoiding false precision in class breaks, showing uncertainty and no-data areas, and framing outputs as a filter for further work rather than a decision.
2. 2.Produce the final map series with an uncertainty figure and write the caveats section.
3. 3.The output is described as a screening filter, and no cell score is presented as a site decision.
Quality review checklist
- Technical content (map, drawing, model or document) fills the majority of the frame and stays legible at 720p.
- Presenter picture-in-picture, if used, stays at roughly 8–10% of the frame, never covers legends, dimensions, labels or annotations, and is hidden on mobile widths and dense technical screens.
- Software shown is limited to QGIS, Spreadsheet software, Word processor, with no suggestion of provider endorsement.
- Capture is a genuine screen recording from the real application — no mockup, simulated interface, AI-generated screen or unverified screenshot.
- The exact software name, version and, where relevant, operating system are read from the recorded session and stated on screen.
- Menus, panels, toolbars, layer controls and the command line or log are visible and legible; the view zooms in wherever text, settings or coordinates would be hard to read.
- The full application interface is shown at the beginning; menus, tools and panels stay visible throughout and the interface context is never cropped away, with zoom retaining enough context to identify the application and tool.
- Real cursor movement with visible highlighting or click indicators is captured; the selected tool, its effect, complete dialogs and the resulting output are all shown.
- The exact command, menu path or tool name is shown as it appears in the software, with useful keyboard shortcuts alongside it and alternative locations explained for other versions.
- Numbered on-screen steps and callouts point at the real controls being used; no menu, tool or command is invented.
- Until an authentic recording exists the lesson reads: “Video lesson: Not recorded — authentic professional recording required.”
- All data on screen is synthetic, publicly licensed or Ideeplan-owned, and is labelled as demonstration data.
- Narration states that methods are jurisdiction-neutral and that local laws, policies and standards must be confirmed.
- Captions and a transcript are produced before the recording can move to professional review.
- No client name, confidential file or private project information appears on screen at any point.

Course production standard

Recordings are screen-first: the planning drawing, GIS view, AutoCAD or Revit workspace stays the main subject of the frame.
Any presenter picture-in-picture normally occupies no more than about 8–10% of the frame and never covers maps, legends, drawings, dimensions or annotations.
On mobile and on dense technical screens the presenter window is reduced further or hidden entirely.
The Principal Consultant portrait is reserved for approved introductions, explanations and conclusions. It is not used as a generic thumbnail for every course.
Narration is planned for professional human delivery. No AI narration, AI presenter or recorded lesson exists today.

No lesson has been recorded. Every lesson media status is “Not recorded”.

Any example data used in teaching is synthetic, publicly licensed or owned by Ideeplan Consult, and is clearly labelled as demonstration data. No client file, confidential document or unauthorised project material is used.

Want this course finished first?

Registering interest is not an enrolment. It tells Ideeplan Consult which subjects to complete and review first.

Discuss a Project

GIS Suitability Modelling and Map Quality Assurance

Written teaching content: available for review

Written course content

Client-style brief

Professional scenario

Planning problem

Learning objectives

Modules and lessons

Module 1 — From brief to criteria

Exclusions versus scored criteria

Choosing indicators and defensible thresholds

Scale, resolution and the analysis grid

Module 2 — Building, weighting and testing the model

Reclassification and standardisation

Weighting methods and combination rules

Sensitivity analysis and validation

Module 3 — Quality assurance and defensible publication

Map quality assurance in practice

Writing a method statement that can be repeated

Communicating suitability without overstating it